what do you call a person who always has to have the last word
Source: wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock
Whether it's in an angry exchange of text messages, a face-to-face argument, or a shouting match on the phone, it's natural to want to be the one to get in the last, definitive discussion. Even so, during the heat of an argument, that last give-and-take may be the worst—and not the best—mode to cease a disharmonism.
Perchance we've all been also heavily influenced by mental images from on-screen romances in which an offended partner delivers the perfect antiphon before making a dramatic go out and slamming the door. The partner left behind and so typically comes to the stunning realization that he or she is in the wrong, and contritely seeks forgiveness.
In real life, arguments rarely follow such a neat, scripted pattern. Existent-world conflict can be messy, hurtful, and damaging to relationships, only specially so when partners play a i-upmanship game during their battle. Yous effigy that if you can but come upwardly with that astounding statement of the "truth," you can set your partner straight. Unfortunately, strategizing during a romantic dispute simply erodes feelings of trust and proficient religion. You may exist "correct" but y'all've merely caused your partner to feel that you care less nearly the human relationship and more about winning.
Ample human relationship inquiry shows that destructive conflict resolution is the most damaging manner to handle the inevitable differences that arise between people who love each other. Wanting to take the last word is very much related to the attack-mode mentality central to destructive conflict resolution, in which y'all take on your partner rather than the difference in viewpoints the two of you take. Conflict doesn't have to exist damaging to a relationship—in fact, co-ordinate to contempo research, it may fifty-fifty help keep a relationship healthy and vital.
University of California, Berkeley psychologists Amie Gordon and Serena Chen (2016) examined the factors that allow couples to argue without damaging their relationship quality—and mayhap even improving it. Their fundamental thesis was that considering "misunderstanding betwixt partners often lies at the eye of conflicts," then "conflict between romantic partners is detrimental to human relationship quality merely when people practice non feel understood past their partners" (p. 240). The feeling of being understood not only reduces the chances that you'll argue with your partner, but it can mitigate the negative feelings that back-trail a fight.
Following on Gordon and Chen's main hypothesis, focusing on the argument detracts from your ability to hear what your partner is actually saying which, in turn, shows that you sympathize that private. Having the last discussion might make you feel better, temporarily, but your partner will emerge unhappier and less trusting of you, making information technology harder to eventually restore the equilibrium that preceded the statement.
Gordon and Chen investigated their hypothesis through a series of seven studies, ranging from correlational to experimental, in which they assessed whether partners who felt improve understood could retain previous feelings of satisfaction after an argument. Rather than rely on the typical college student sample alone (although they did for one of their studies), the researchers sampled from a nationally-recruited range of adults in long-term relationships.
The researchers focused on the way partners felt during conflict. Although the behavioral approach of counting types of communication used in many studies of disharmonize resolution has certain advantages, information technology fails to capture the perceived feelings of being understood that Gordon and Chen hypothesized to be so central to successful conflict resolution. In other words, a researcher may count the number of negative statements you hurl at your partner, but if your partner doesn't accept them seriously, do they really count equally an attack? On the other paw, if your partner knows merely how to brand jabs at you, the researcher may not even record these statements equally being accusatory or derogatory. That "last word" may authorize as one of these successfully camouflaged attacks: It doesn't sound so bad to an outsider, but information technology cuts you to the core.
- Why Relationships Matter
- Observe a therapist to strengthen relationships
The most intriguing written report in the Berkeley series involved creating the feeling of being understood during an argument. Participants were asked to imagine themselves in a fight with their partner under i of two weather. In the understood status, they were told: "Imagine that you and your partner are having a fight about [a topic identified by the participant]. During this fight, we would like y'all to imagine that your partner is able to empathize your thoughts, feelings, and point of view. That is, you feel understood by your partner. Please take a moment to imagine this fight. Picture where you are, what you lot and your partner are saying, and how you are feeling." In the other condition, participants were told to imagine their partner did not empathise them.
Across the entire set up of studies, the results consistently pointed to that sense of perceived understanding counteracting the potentially negative effects of conflicts. Indeed, Gordon and Chen maintain that perceived understanding becomes the buffer that allows partners to argue without feeling hopeless about their relationship. Mayhap this is why, when you see couples that stay together despite what looks to yous like a miserable relationship, y'all're not getting the full picture. They may bicker constantly but however exist able to become to bed feeling content with each other.
Relationships Essential Reads
This fascinating ready of studies shows just what's wrong with playing to win in an argument. Focusing on yourself and not your partner'southward feelings non but keeps yous from coming upwards with a positive resolution in the moment, just over the long term, it tin cause your partner to become more emotionally distant.
Long-term fulfillment in relationships takes work, but as long equally that piece of work includes trying to understand your partner, you'll care less about "winning" arguments and more than about preserving the skillful feelings that allow your connection to stay strong.
Follow me on Twitter @swhitbo for daily updates on psychology, health, and aging. Experience gratis to join my Facebook group, "Fulfillment at Any Historic period," to discuss today's post, or to ask questions most this post.
Copyright Susan Krauss Whitbourne, 2016.
References
Gordon, A. Thou., & Chen, South. (2016). Practice you get where I'chiliad coming from?: Perceived agreement buffers against the negative impact of conflict on human relationship satisfaction. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 239-260. doi:ten.1037/pspi0000039
Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201605/do-you-or-your-partner-always-need-have-the-last-word
0 Response to "what do you call a person who always has to have the last word"
Post a Comment